

Book a Demo
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
For years, pipeline coverage has been a core metric for revenue teams. A 3x or 4x pipeline-to-quota ratio meant you were in good shape. The logic was simple: the more pipeline you have, the better your chances of hitting your number and setting yourself up for success in the future.
But if recent years have shown us anything, it’s this: pipeline volume doesn’t always translate to revenue confidence, especially with the growing complexity of the buying cycle.
Revenue teams are hitting their coverage targets but are still coming up short. The pipeline looks full, yet deals are stuck, slow, or quietly slipping away. The forecast says yes—but the quarter closes with a miss.
It’s not that pipeline coverage no longer matters. It does. But it’s no longer enough on its own.
Pipeline coverage offers a quick view of how much potential revenue exists relative to your goals. But it rarely tells you how likely that revenue is to materialize. That’s because traditional coverage metrics are often based on incomplete or misleading assumptions:
According to Forrester, only 27% of B2B companies believe their pipeline coverage accurately reflects future revenue. That’s a clear signal: volume alone doesn’t equal confidence.
Forward-thinking revenue teams are shifting their focus. Instead of asking, “Do we have enough pipeline?”, they’re asking, “Do we have the right pipeline—and do we understand how it’s moving?”
Here’s what they’re measuring:
Knowing how much pipeline you have is helpful. But knowing how well it converts is more powerful. Teams are now breaking down conversion by stage to understand where friction occurs and what to do to fix it.
Is the buyer responding to follow-ups? Are key stakeholders involved? Has the deal gone quiet? Tracking engagement gives a clearer picture of whether a deal is real—or at risk.
Instead of relying on rep sentiment or manual calculations, many teams are turning to AI to score deals based on real-time data and behavior, not gut instinct.
It’s not enough to generate demand—you have to understand where deals slow down and why. Teams that optimize beyond the top of the funnel are better equipped to forecast and convert consistently.
Explore how deep funnel optimization drives revenue →
To go from pipeline volume to pipeline confidence, revenue teams need to move beyond surface-level indicators and embrace pipeline risk intelligence—a more nuanced view of deal health, stage progression, and hidden blockers.
Pipeline risk intelligence answers questions traditional coverage metrics can’t:
By layering in insights like intent data, historical benchmarks, and rep behavior patterns, revenue leaders can better identify false positives in the funnel. These are deals that look good on paper but are unlikely to close due to lack of stakeholder engagement, low activity levels, or poor historical conversion trends.
More advanced teams are creating risk-adjusted pipeline models that weight opportunities based on deal quality and momentum—bringing a whole new level of precision to pipeline reviews and forecasting conversations.
Instead of chasing volume or cleaning up bad deals at the end of the quarter, they’re proactively reallocating resources and doubling down on the most viable opportunities earlier in the cycle.
Pipeline coverage still has value—but it’s even more powerful when paired with pipeline quality and movement.
Ask yourself:
When you can answer "yes" to those questions, coverage becomes more than a number, it becomes a confidence metric.