Know which channel funds pipeline

Multi-touch attribution, marketing mix modeling, incrementality testing, and spend reallocation on one identity-resolved context layer. The CMO walks into the QBR with a defensible recommendation.

Module 01 · Demand Gen Effectiveness

How effective is demand gen? One screen

How Effective Is Our Demand Generation?Live
Budget
$0K
+10.7% QoQ
Spend
$0K
+10.1% QoQ
MQL Volume
0
+13.5% QoQ
Pipeline Value
$0K
+15.3% QoQ
Pipeline ROI
0.0x
+9.1% QoQ
Bookings Value
$0K
+16.8% QoQ
Detailed TabularPerformance & TrendsInsights
Key MetricsVolumeValue
ChannelSpendMQLsPipelineBookings
LinkedIn Ads$21K1,840$4.2M$680K
Google Ads$152K2,310$2.9M$390K
Events$64K410$3.1M$720K
Content / SEO$53K980$1.4M$210K
Webinars$60K620$1.1M$180K

The most-used view in the product answers one question verbatim: How Effective Is Our Demand Generation? Channel-by-channel performance across pipeline, bookings, and ROI, with period-over-period deltas. The screen the CMO opens every Monday, the screen the board sees once a quarter.

  • Three main views: Detailed Tabular · Performance & Trends · Insights
  • Summary metrics across Key Metrics / Volume / Value sub-tabs
  • Detailed Tabular scales to 4,820 campaigns across 482 pages
  • Performance & Trends splits into Trend / Analyse / Compare
  • Insights ranks top-N and bottom-N performers by any metric
  • AI Summary, Take a Tour, and one-click Export on every view
  • Period selector and engagement filters synced across modules
Module 02 · Marketing Mix Modeling

Marketing Mix Modeling, built in

Saturation curves · MMXMMX
Quarterly LinkedIn spend ($K) →Pipeline value →PipelineROI
ChannelSaturation pt.Recommend
LinkedIn Ads~$840KHold
Google Ads~$520K+12%
Eventsno saturation+25%
Direct Mail~$80K-15%

Saturation curves and diminishing-returns analysis per channel, time-series-aware. MMX tells you what would have worked at twice the spend, and what would have stopped working at half.

  • Time-series-aware with carryover effects
  • Saturation curves per channel
  • Optimal reallocation with pipeline lift
  • Causal inference behind every recommendation
  • MMX and MTA on one context layer
Module 03 · Incrementality Testing

Incrementality testing, not just correlation

Incrementality test · Googleads_EMEA_Q2Significant
Test
$2.4M
Control
$1.5M
Lift
+60%
Confidence
0%
Test cells
0
P-value
0.00

Statistical lift studies with hold-out groups and a modeled counterfactual: pre & post analysis, DiD analysis. When the CFO asks 'would we have gotten this revenue anyway,' there is a defensible answer.

  • Pre & post analysis against a historical baseline
  • Difference-in-differences (DiD) test across matched cohorts
  • p-value and effect size reported per run
  • Incrementality test runs as a saved view in Marketing Performance
  • CFO-grade one-page test summaries
Module 04 · Campaign Reallocation

Existing allocation. Reallocation opportunity. One click between

How Can I Optimize My Campaign Allocation?Awaiting approval
LinkedIn Ads+2.1pp
Now
28.4%
Recommended
30.5%
Google Ads+3.4pp
Now
22.1%
Recommended
25.5%
Events+4.7pp
Now
18.7%
Recommended
23.4%
Direct Mail-3.2pp
Now
4.2%
Recommended
1.0%
Projected pipeline lift
+0%
same budget
Confidence
0%
Reversible
Yes

The module answers How Can I Optimize My Campaign Allocation? Existing Allocation sits on the left with its current Pipeline and Booking ROI. Reallocation Opportunity sits on the right with the projected outcomes if you move spend as the AI recommends, with the uplift shown as a percentage. Same budget, more pipeline. Approve and push to Google or LinkedIn directly, roll back any move in one click.

  • Existing Allocation vs Reallocation Opportunity, side by side
  • Optimize based on Pipeline Generated or Booking Generated
  • Top-N performing campaigns vs Bottom-N, ranked together
  • Push to Google, LinkedIn, Meta directly
  • Propose / approve / commit / roll back via Safe Autonomy
  • Audit trail per move with who and when
Module 05 · Board Dashboard

From spend to bookings, in one screen

Board Dashboard · Marketing PerformanceQ2 FY26
Marketing PerformancePipeline HealthPipeline AnalyticsFunnel HealthKey DealsChannel EffectivenessCampaign and Budget
Budget
$0K
+10.7% QoQ
Spend
$0K
+10.1% QoQ
Lead Vol
0
+14.3% QoQ
Pipe Vol
0
+12.4% QoQ
Book Vol
0
+18.2% QoQ
Pipe Val
$0K
+15.3% QoQ
Impressions
2.4M
Engagements
186K
Eng. rate
7.7%
Known visits
12K

Board Dashboard is one of the saved views inside Marketing Performance, alongside True Lead Source & Dark Social, Sales Rep Effectiveness, Account Progression, and the Google Lift Test. Nine sub-tabs span attribution, pipeline health, channel effectiveness, funnel-stage deep dive, and campaign budget.

  • Nine sub-tabs, one source of truth
  • Contribution by channel with stage selector
  • Account engagement trends (LinkedIn-aware)
  • True Lead Source & Dark Social attribution built in
  • Quarterly trends with region overlay
  • Board-ready PDF + PNG export
Module 06 · Response Curve Analysis

Response Curve Analysis, per channel

Response Curve · Spend → Pipeline (LinkedIn)Q3 2024 – Q2 2025
Quarterly LinkedIn spend ($K) →Pipeline value →PipelineROI
Saturation
~$0K
per quarter
Marginal ROI @ today
0.0x

Quarterly spend on each channel mapped against quarterly generated pipeline value. Plus a spend-vs-ROI curve showing diminishing returns.

  • Spend → pipeline response curve per channel
  • ROI overlay showing diminishing returns
  • Region overlay (NA, EMEA, APAC)
  • Log-axis toggle for wide-spend channels
  • Marginal ROI at current and ±20% spend
Agents on this play

The team that ships this outcome

Each agent below reads this application's context, decides the next move, and ships it back into your live tools · proposed, approved, reversible.

Campaign Reallocation AgentPushes the recommended mix to Google, LinkedIn, and Meta · approve and ship.
De-Anonymized Visitors EmailEmails the buyers your spend just brought in, resolved to named contacts.
ICP Leads from Google AdsPulls fit-scored leads from paid into the CRM the moment they convert.
Personalized Email AgentDrafts and sends per-lead follow-up, writing back to Marketo and the CRM.
In production at Zscaler

RevSure's mix modeling gave us a defensible answer to the CFO's 'would we have closed that revenue anyway' question. For the first time, the response curves told us where to stop spending, not just where to spend more.

Suruchi Sharma
VP Marketing · Zscaler

Reallocation impact
Same budget
Higher pipeline yield from the same spend, without adding headcount or tools.
Ready when your stack is

Fund the channels that close

Implementation included. The migration off your current attribution stack is on us.